Showing posts with label Overview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Overview. Show all posts

Tuesday

Wireless Local Loop

A wireless local loop (WLL) is a generic term for an access system that uses a wireless link to connect subscribers to their local exchange in place of conventional copper cabling. Wireless local loop—also known as fixed wireless access (FWA), or simply fixed radio—entails the use of analog or digital radio technology to provide telephone, facsimile and data services to business and residential subscribers. Depending on the existing telecommunications infrastructure, demand for services, and local market conditions, this technology can be both a substitute and a complement to copper wire in the local loop. WLL systems can help eliminate the backlog of orders for telephone service, which is estimated at over 50 million lines worldwide.


Add a note hereThere are many WLL technologies operating in several radio frequencies and which adhere to different wireless standards. Most of them operate in a similar manner as cellular telephony, but WLL is fixed, not mobile. WLL systems provide rapid deployment of basic phone service in areas where the terrain or telecommunications development makes installation of traditional wireline service less attractive and less cost-effective. WLL systems can be easily integrated into the wireline public switched telephone network (PSTN) and can usually be deployed within a month of equipment delivery, far more quickly than traditional wireline installations which can take several months for initial deployment and years to grow capacity to meet the continually growing demand for communication services.

Add a note hereWLL systems also offer increased implementation and design flexibility. They can be used to provide first-line communication services in areas where there is no wireline infrastructure, or they can be implemented selectively as alternatives for wired feeder, distribution, or drop, as well as in competitive situations where there is convergence of the fixed and mobile markets.

Add a note hereWLL systems require minimal planning and can be deployed quickly, offering first-line telephone service to thousands of subscribers in a matter of months, instead of years. This is because operators can avoid having to deal with frequent wired local loop build-out issues which can be capital intensive. With WLL systems, construction costs are minimal and there is no need to arrange for rights-of-way for buried cable, both of which can dramatically slow down first-line service growth.

Add a note hereWith WLL systems, operators can deliver service where it is needed, when it is needed—helping to reduce financial risk by ensuring faster payback on capital investments, especially if the system adheres to industry-accepted standards and protocols. Open standards and protocols allow operators to create efficient multiple-vendor systems, basing their technology planning and purchasing decisions on quality, effectiveness, and value without being locked into a single equipment vendor.

Add a note hereWLL technology is also generally compatible with existing operations support systems (OSS), as well as existing transmission and distribution systems. WLL systems are scalable, enabling operators to leverage their previous infrastructure investments as the system grows.

Add a note hereWLL solutions include analog systems for medium-to-low-density and rural applications. For high-density, high-growth urban and suburban locations, there are WLL solutions based on the digital standard optimal for wireless local loop use, Code Division Multiple Access, or CDMA. TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) and GSM (Global System for Mobile telecommunications) systems are also offered. In addition to being able to provide higher voice quality than analog systems, digital WLL systems are able to support higher-speed fax and data services.

Add a note hereAlthough WLL systems are often based on mobile wireless technology, it is principally a fixed service. With the location of the subscribers known, a WLL system deployment can be tailored to provide user coverage at less cost than a comparable mobile system. However, WLL vendors such as Ericsson, Lucent Technologies, Motorola, Nokia, and Nortel offer complete network solutions that can serve both WLL and mobile cellular subscribers. The difference between fully mobile and WLL subscribers is the tariffing and numbering arrangements. WLL customers are typically charged using wireline tariffs and the numbering plan is similar to the wireline numbering plan. Mobile subscribers are charged according to mobile tariffs and they may have a different numbering space.

Add a note hereWLL subscribers receive phone service through a radio unit linked to the PSTN via a local base station. The radio unit consists of a transceiver, power supply, and antenna. It operates off AC- or DC-power and may be mounted indoors or outdoors, and it usually includes battery back-up for use during line power outages. On the customer side, the radio unit connects to the premises wiring, enabling the customer to use existing phones, modems, fax machines, and answering devices (Figure 1). The use of a cordless phone can provide mobility within the home or office.


Add a note hereFigure 9.1: The fixed wireless terminal is installed at the customer location. It connects several standard terminal devices (telephone, answering machine, fax, computer) to the nearest cell site Base Transceiver Station (BTS).

Add a note hereThe WLL subscriber has access to all the usual voice and data features, such as caller ID, call forwarding, call waiting, three-way calling, and distinctive ringing. Some radio units provide multiple channels, which are equivalent to having multiple lines. The radio unit offers service operators the advantage of over-the-air programming and activation to minimize service calls and network management costs.
Add a note hereThe radio unit contains a coding and decoding unit that converts conventional speech into a digital format during voice transmission and back into a nondigital format for reception. Many TDMA-based WLL systems use the 8-Kbps Enhanced Variable Rate Coder (EVRC), which became a published Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) standard (IS-127) in January 1997. EVRC provides benefits to both network operators and subscribers.

Add a note hereFor operators, the high-quality voice reproduction of the EVRC does not sacrifice the capacity of a network nor the coverage area of a cell site. An 8-Kbps EVRC system, using the same number of cell sites, provides network operators with greater than 100 percent additional capacity than the 13-Kbps voice coders that are deployed in CDMA-based WLL systems. In fact, an 8-Kbps EVRC system requires at least 50 percent fewer cell sites than a comparable 13-Kbps system to provide similar coverage and in-building penetration.
Add a note hereFor subscribers, the 8-Kbps EVRC uses a state-of-the-art background noise suppression algorithm to improve the quality of speech in noisy environments typical of urban streets where there is heavy pedestrian and vehicular traffic. This also is an advantage compared with traditional landline phone systems which do not have equivalent noise suppression capabilities.

Add a note hereDepending on vendor, the radio unit may also include special processors to enhance call privacy on analog WLL systems. Voice privacy is enhanced through the use of a Digital Signal Processor (DSP)-based speech coder, an echo canceler, a data encryption algorithm, and an error detection/correction mechanism. To prevent eavesdropping, the low bit rate encoded speech data is encrypted using a private key algorithm, which is randomly generated during a call. The key is used by the DSPs at both ends of the communications link to decrypt the received signal.

Add a note hereThe use of a DSPs in the radio units of analog WLL systems also provides subscribers with other benefits, such as improved fax and data transmission.

Saturday

Overview | Wireless LANs

Most computers in the corporate environment are tied together over wired LANs so that users can access and share data, applications, and services. However, a growing number of applications require mobility as well as network access. One way of achieving both objectives is for a notebook computer to plug into a docking station, which is wired to the LAN. Another way is for the notebook's PCMCIA card to establish a wireless connection to the nearest access point, which is wired to the LAN. Of course, desktop computers can be interconnected with each other over a wireless LAN, and connect to a wired LAN only when necessary through an access point. A network interface card (NIC) equipped with a transceiver links individual network nodes. External antennas allow for omnidirectional transmission instead of requiring a clear line of sight.

Coverage can be extended to other floors, between buildings, or across a metropolitan area using wireless bridge/routers. Since it is not necessary to install new cabling, wireless LANs offer a convenient alternative for adding or moving users. Both Ethernet and token ring LANs are supported over wireless links and the devices can be managed using standard SNMP-based management packages or vendor-specific configuration tools.

Notebook and desktop computers are not the only devices that require wireless connections. Mobile terminals—PDAs, specialized handheld terminals, and barcode scanners—connected to wireless LANs are being increasingly used to enhance business operations. Mobile data applications are raising the productivity of essential personnel and eliminating unnecessary paperwork, cutting operations costs in the process. These devices are also used to increase revenues by bringing products, services and transaction points closer to users via wireless connections.

While the use of wireless networks answers the need for mobility and solves many network administration problems, they do have their share of drawbacks. For example, wireless LANs usually transmit at slower speeds than wired LANs, and the frequencies used for data transmission are subject to interference which can impair performance. The fact that signals are radiated in the air may present security concerns. The products of many vendors are not interoperable with each other; wireless LANs are often too small to make interoperability a strong issue. And although prices are dropping, wireless LANs are still more expensive than wired LANs.

Despite these limitations, however, wireless LANs are here to stay and will continue to improve and grow. With the IEEE 802.11 standard for wireless LAN communication released in 1997, a number of basic media and configuration issues, transmission procedures, throughput requirements, and range characteristics are addressed which can help reduce the risk of product incompatibility and early obsolescence. Over the long term, the 802.11 standard is expected to help make wireless LANs price-competitive with wired networks.

One source of multivendor product incompatibility is that different wireless technologies are used to implement wireless LANs. The three popular technologies currently in use are spread spectrum, infrared, and microwave.

Spread-spectrum modulation is a more complex form of AM/FM. It uses low-power, 900-MHz radio waves. The maximum attainable speeds are 1 Mbps or 2 Mbps, which is far too slow for current 10 Mbps and 16 Mbps LANs. Infrared uses short-wavelength light for transmission and it works well at higher speeds, but it offers the least amount of coverage and requires a line-of-sight connection between devices. These problems can be easily overcome, but at the greater cost. Microwave transmission at 18 GHz is a very effective communications medium, but it requires an FCC license. This is not an obstacle, if the vendor acts on the customer's behalf to obtain the license. Although offering greater range, microwave is more expensive than either spread spectrum or infrared.

Friday

Centrex Overview

Centrex (also called Plexar, CentraNet, Centron, Cenpac, Intellipath or Presstige) is a business telephone service offered by your local telephone company from the local central office. Most medium-sized and larger companies use a PBX because it’s much less expensive than connecting an external telephone line to every telephone in the organization. In addition, it’s easier to call someone within a PBX because the number you need to dial is typically just 3 or 4 digits.
Add a Note HereBut many companies, particularly smaller businesses, may not want to purchase and manage their own telephone system because of the capital investment, technical requirements, or time limitations. Most local telephone companies sell Centrex and lease it to businesses as a substitute for an on-the-business-premisess telephone system that must be bought or leased.
Add a Note HereCentrex lines usually cost about 20% to 50% more per month than plain analog phone lines. Since local dial tone in the US and Canada is inexpensive, Centrex can be a cost effective way to get the features of a PBX without having to buy a PBX.
Add a Note HereCentrex may not be for you. You need to compare the rates and features of Centrex to what PBX and key systems have to offer.
Add a Note HereYou need to decide what makes better business sense: leasing Centrex or buying your own switching system.
Add a Note HereThe principal advantages Centrex to small and home-based businesses (called SOHO or Small Office, Home Office) are a low cost of entry, centralized maintenance, and scalability.
Add a Note HereYou get “business phone service” without having to buy equipment (though there are contracts and recurring charges). You can tie together multiple locations under the same four-digit dialing scheme (though many PBXs can also be configured to do this). You don’t need to hire somebody to babysit your phone system. And you can (if your CO has the capacity) expand from five lines to five thousand, without running through several generations of CPE (Customer Premisess Equipment) in the process.

Sunday

Overview of ANSI/TIA/EIA 569

ANSI/TIA/EIA 569 is the Commercial Building Standard for Telecommunications Pathways and Spaces. The purpose of 569 is to standardize design and construction practices within and between buildings that support telecommunications equipment and transmission media. The standards are outlined for rooms, areas, and pathways into and through which telecommunications transmission media and equipment are installed. The standard is limited to the telecommunications aspect of building construction and design and does not cover safety aspects.

The specifications of 569 cover the following building elements:

  • Entrance facilities

  • Equipment room

  • Backbone pathways

  • Telecommunications closet

  • Horizontal pathways

  • Workstation

The entrance facility, equipment room, telecommunications closet, and workstation areas were described briefly in the preceding section on 568. The backbone and horizontal pathways are used for the corresponding cabling described above. Backbone pathways consist of intra- and inter-building pathways. Intrabuilding pathways consist of conduits, sleeves, and trays. They provide the means for routing cables from the entrance facility to telecommunications closets and from equipment rooms to the entrance facility or the telecommunications closet. Interbuilding pathways interconnect separate buildings and consist of underground, buried, aerial, and tunnel pathways. Horizontal pathways are facilities for the installation of the telecommunications transmission media from the telecommunications closet to the telecommunications outlet at the workstation area.

The 569 specifications require a minimum of one telecommunications closet per floor, and that additional closets should be added if the floor area to be served exceeds 1,000 square meters or the horizontal distance to the work area is greater than 300 feet. At least one telecommunications outlet per workstation area is specified.

A very important area covered by 569 is labeling and color-coding specifications designed to simplify installation and maintenance of the cabling infrastructure.

Labels are divided into three categories: adhesive, insert, and other. Adhesive labels must meet UL requirements for adhesion, defacement, legibility, and exposure. Insert labels must meet UL requirements for defacement, legibility, and exposure. Other labels include special-purpose labels, such as tie-on labels.

The 569 color coding rules are:

  • Termination labels at the two ends of the cable should have the same color

  • Crossconnections between termination fields generally should have two different colors

  • The color orange is used for the demarcation point

  • Green identifies network connections on the customer side of the demarcation point

  • Purple identifies the termination of cables originating from common equipment

  • White indicates the first level of the backbone media

  • Gray indicates the second level of the backbone media

  • Blue identifies the termination of station telecommunications media

  • Brown identifies interbuilding backbone cable terminations

  • Yellow identifies the termination of auxiliary circuits, alarms, security, and other miscellaneous circuits

  • Red identifies the termination of KTSs

  • White may be used to identify second-level backbone terminations in remote “non-hub” buildings

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Link Exchange